California nears first-in-nation ban on plastic glitter in cosmetics


A makeup artist applies shimmering eyeshadow to a client’s eyelid. Photo via iStock

By 2029, eyeshadows, nail polishes and other cosmetics that shimmer and shine from plastic glitter could be banned in California.

In the latest push to curb the prevalence of microplastics in the environment, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday unanimously approved a first-in-the-nation bill that would ban the sale of personal care products that contain plastic glitter or plastic microbeads.

The proposal by Assemblymember Tasha Boerner would expand a 2015 state law that already bans microplastic beads in products that are intended to be immediately rinsed off, such as face washes and toothpastes. 

But the latest bill would apply to products that are left on — including lotions and makeup — as well as household products such as cleaners, detergents and paint. Companies add microbeads to these items to give them abrasive or exfoliating properties.

Research has found that microplastics — extremely small particles of plastic that do not break down easily in the environment — detected in the human body could be linked to cardiovascular disease and stroke, cancer, and neurological problems

Potentially harmful levels of so-called “forever chemicals” associated with plastics are found in California’s coastal waters and drinking water. State lawmakers recently banned sturdier single-use plastic bags, and attempted to ban the use of forever chemicals in synthetic turf.

This wouldn’t spell the end of California stores stocking glittering makeup, though. Some major cosmetic brands sell products that contain mica, a mineral that can lend makeup its shimmer. Though concerns have been raised about mica sourcing, some research has found that mica could serve as a naturally-occuring alternative to plastic glitter.

  • Boerner, a Solana Beach Democrat: “I’m all for glitter and glamor. But let it be safe and let it not harm our health. ”

The bill is now before the Senate’s appropriations committee. If passed, California manufacturers and retailers that make, distribute or sell these products would be fined up to $2,500 per day for each violation.


Focus on Inland Empire: Each Wednesday, CalMatters Inland Empire reporter Deborah Brennan surveys the big stories from that part of California. Read her newsletter and sign up here to receive it.

CalMatters’ 10-year anniversary drive: Safeguard CalMatters’ independent, nonpartisan and fearless journalism for California’s future. Give now and donations will be matched dollar-for-dollar by our board of directors.



Newsom backtracks on return-to-office policy

Calling for an end to severe understaffing and poverty wages for state workers represented by SEIU Local 1000, marchers rally in State Capitol Park World Peace Rose Garden in Sacramento on June 8, 2023.
SEIU Local 1000 marchers rally in State Capitol Park World Peace Rose Garden in Sacramento on June 8, 2023. Photo by Julie A Hotz for CalMatters

As part of new labor agreements with some of California’s state workers unions, Gov. Gavin Newsom agreed to delay his return-to-office policy. But the move has raised certain doubts about the governor’s original intentions among some labor leaders and proponents of in-person work alike, reports CalMatters’ Maya C. Miller.

In March the governor ordered state workers back to the office at least four days a week, starting July 1, saying that “in-person work makes us all stronger.” 

A few weeks before that policy was to take effect, however, the union representing state engineers struck a labor deal to pause that mandate for one year. Two other unions, including SEIU Local 1000, reached a deal to delay the order.

Anica Walls, SEIU Local 1000’s president, said the pause is “a direct result of our members fighting back.” But also that members considered Newsom’s about-face as having “more to do with politics and pressure than performance.”

Read more here.

CalFire chatbot not up to snuff?

Several individuals wearing protective gear and helmets work together to dig a firebreak in a forested area. Flames burn nearby, casting an orange glow on the scene, as smoke rises through the trees.
CalFire firefighters cut a fire line during an uncontrolled fire at the Hughes Fire in Castaic on Jan. 22, 2025. Photo by David McNew, Getty Images

A CalFire chatbot to help Californians access important fire prevention information and “near-real-time emergency information,” is stumbling at answering basic questions, writes CalMatters’ Malena Carollo.

When it debuted in May, the artificial intelligence-powered chatbot was intended to provide, among other things, resources on wildfire incidents and home hardening, according to Newsom’s office.

But two months after its launch, Malena found that the chatbot sometimes spits out different answers to questions that mean the same thing. It also doesn’t generate the most up-to-date wildfire information and is unable to provide information about evacuation orders.

CalFire says it’s working on improving the tool, but some experts say that not only should the kinks have been ironed out before the rollout, but that the public should have had more input too.

The chatbot is part of Newsom’s 2023 executive order to develop more AI tools to improve government efficiency. Other AI-powered tools in development for the state include ones related to highway congestion and tax preparation

Read more here.

And lastly: Body cams on CHP officers

The shoulder of a brown uniform with the California Highway Patrol badge and logo design on the arm. The light from the sun shines through onto the coat, illuminating it in a dark room.
California Highway Patrol uniforms at the CHP Academy in Sacramento on Sept. 13, 2024. Photo by Florence Middleton, CalMatters

The California Highway Patrol — one of the state’s largest police forces — plans to equip all its officers with body cameras by next year. The move comes three years after CalMatters reported that only 3% of highway patrol officers had body-worn cameras. Learn more from CalMatters’ Byrhonda Lyons



Other things worth your time:

Some stories may require a subscription to read.


Supreme Court will allow Trump’s downsizing of federal workforce // The Washington Post

CA deploys rescue teams to help Texas after deadly floods // San Francisco Chronicle

What Trump’s budget and tax law means for CA students // EdSource

What Trump’s latest order means for national parks like Yosemite // San Francisco Chronicle

They crashed. They killed. They’re driving again in the North Bay — and it’s perfectly legal // The Press Democrat

ICE officers drive through protesters trying to stop arrest at SF immigration court // KQED

ICE leaves cars abandoned, lawn mowers running when it arrests workers // Los Angeles Times

Six months of LA-area wildfire recovery through the eyes of the Army Corps colonel on the frontlines // The Orange County Register

LA business leaders express tariff frustration to CA AG Bonta // Los Angeles Times

How affordable housing became a cash machine for San Diego County labor unions // inewsource

Avatar photo

Lynn La is the newsletter writer for CalMatters, focusing on California’s top political, policy and Capitol stories every weekday. She produces and curates WhatMatters, CalMatters’ flagship daily newsletter… More by Lynn La



Source link

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top